FORECASTSEASON.COMLane 1 · U.S. Route 90SEAS5 ExplorerProbabilityAnalogsSecond OpinionCitiesModelsDriversAbout
SEASON90Forecast SeasonSeasonal Outlooks · U.S. · Europe · Global
Forecast Season/United States
Lane 1 · U.S. Route 90

United States

Three seasonal systems over the same ground, month by month, with the skill of each one's own reforecast beside it — and a straight answer about where American seasonal forecasts are worth acting on.

U.S.90
What is open here today. 3 forecast systems over this lane — SEAS5, C3S multi-system, NMME — all on the 1 October 2026 initialisation and each carrying the skill of its own reforecast, beside the SEAS5 Explorer, the Model Garage and the Drivers. Nothing on this page is a placeholder.

What the systems say

1 October 2026 · routes 10 · 03 · 02

Temperature

TargetleadSEAS5C3S multi-systemNMME
P(above)skillP(above)skillP(above)skill
October 2026 part elapsed+044%85%44%98%40%96%
November 2026+126%54%36%60%32%61%
December 2026+237%41%38%56%35%56%
January 2027+332%47%33%72%37%42%
February 2027+424%53%27%90%36%93%
March 2027+534%46%28%89%32%64%
below normal33.3% — climatology, the no-information lineabove normalskill = share of land in the box where this system’s own reforecast beat climatology; † marks below half

They are furthest apart on February 2027: NMME puts the odds of an above-normal month at 36% where SEAS5 puts them at 24% — 11 points between two systems reading the same ground for the same month. The skill column is the one that governs how much of this to believe: 54–61% of this box beat climatology at November 2026, and 46–89% by March 2027.

Rainfall

TargetleadSEAS5C3S multi-systemNMME
P(above)skillP(above)skillP(above)skill
October 2026 part elapsed+025%78%39%89%34%76%
November 2026+146%41%45%60%44%52%
December 2026+240%47%44%61%41%61%
January 2027+341%37%45%67%44%52%
February 2027+448%42%44%61%45%62%
March 2027+548%43%42%56%44%45%
below normal33.3% — climatology, the no-information lineabove normal

They are furthest apart on March 2027: SEAS5 puts the odds of an above-normal month at 48% where C3S multi-system puts them at 42% — 6 points between two systems reading the same ground for the same month. The skill column is the one that governs how much of this to believe: 41–60% of this box beat climatology at November 2026, and 43–56% by March 2027.

All three columns are the 1 October 2026 initialisation: SEAS5 (route 10), C3S multi-system (route 03), NMME (route 02). Each is that system’s probability that the month lands in the upper third of its own trend-adjusted climatology, area-weighted over land inside the same box — the routes share the box and the averaging code, so the differences here are real disagreements and not an artefact of how each was measured. They do not share a reforecast period — SEAS5 1993–2016; C3S multi-system 1993–2016; NMME 1991–2016 — so the tercile boundaries themselves are drawn from slightly different climates. It is a small difference and it is not nothing.

And what this site’s own engine says

Route 09
OND 2026
+1.42 °C
of which +0.99 is signal rather than trend
skilful over 31% of the box
NDJ 2027
+1.83 °C
of which +1.32 is signal rather than trend
skilful over 32% of the box
DJF 2027
+2.12 °C
of which +1.65 is signal rather than trend
skilful over 27% of the box
JFM 2027
+1.94 °C
of which +1.29 is signal rather than trend
skilful over 27% of the box
FMA 2027
+1.45 °C
of which +0.76 is signal rather than trend
skilful over 42% of the box

The Analog Bench does not appear in the table above, and cannot: it forecasts rolling three-month seasons where the others forecast months, and it publishes an anomaly in degrees where they publish a tercile probability. Holding those side by side in one row would be arithmetic on unlike quantities.

It is here because it carries one number nothing else on this site does. Signal is the anomaly with the warming trend taken back out — what the analogue years actually contribute beyond what you would get by drawing a straight line through the last forty. Where the two are close, the forecast is mostly the trend and deserves to be read as such. The analogues are drawn from the ocean state through July–August–September 2026.

The systems behind those numbers

Routes 10 · 03 · 02

Official

The CPC outlooks

NOAA's Climate Prediction Center issues the United States' official monthly and seasonal outlooks on the third Thursday of every month, as tercile probabilities for temperature and precipitation, plus a seasonal drought outlook. They are the benchmark — not a competitor.

Dynamical

The NMME behind them

Eight coupled models from NOAA, NASA, GFDL, NCAR and Environment Canada, pooled into roughly a hundred members. The NMME is the single most useful thing to put next to a CPC map, because it shows you how much of the outlook is agreement and how much is one model.

European view

SEAS5 over North America

ECMWF's system covers the United States too, on a different model core with a different set of biases. Where SEAS5 and the NMME agree over North America, that is worth something; where they disagree, that is worth more.

Where US seasonal skill actually lives

Be honest about this

Winter temperature over the southern and eastern United States, in a year with a well-developed ENSO event, is about as good as mid-latitude seasonal forecasting gets — the Pacific jet is being pushed by something the models genuinely predict. Winter precipitation across the southern tier and the Pacific Northwest inherits the same signal.

Summer precipitation over the Corn Belt, by contrast, is close to unforecastable three months out, and any product that implies otherwise is over-selling itself. The useful summer signal is in soil moisture and the trend, not in the circulation.

Temperature outlooks almost everywhere carry a large and unglamorous contribution from the warming trend. That is real skill and it counts — but a site ought to tell you when the model is adding to it and when it is just riding it.

Next exits